Secrecy and power, companies decide on people's lives Last Database without them being able to know what the selection criteria and the data contemplated were or if they were actively discriminated against or not. The systematization of inequalities within Last Database societies is the order of the day.
Old disputes, new forms of underdevelopment
The motto «Remove the ladder to development» that the South Korean Last Database economist Ha-Joon Chang used on the cover of one of his books is still valid as never before.
But it acquires a new dimension: cyberneticseleven. The truth is that, Last Database faced with the almost inadvertent accumulation of data by the global South, the United States functions like a vacuum cleaner that absorbed the raw material for artificial intelligence in large volumes and was thus able to develop systems that are unmatched today. Even if a Last Database country today considered the possibility of creating a local Google, it would not achieve the same success due to the scarcity of Last Database data and, in many places, of trained human resources. Moreover, it would not make sense to do so. Scale undoubtedly led to efficiency in what could be considered a kind of natural monopoly.
It would be very costly for a country to channel such a Last Database strategy and the result would be uncertain. Competition with the tech giants is pointless in an economy that has already crowned them kings and lords.12. Only China, with its big data Last Database created behind closed doors thanks to its more than 1,300 million users and data producers, was able to develop an artificial intelligence that today plays the battle as equals with US capitalism. The dispute between winners and losers of that Last Database battle is only between these two players in the world economy.
The truth is that the gigantic profits generated by these companies by subsuming traditional industrial companies and offering.